You need to take this up with National Right to Life, the Susan B Anthony List, CatholicVote, Family Research Council, etc, etc, etc. These are the dominant pro-life organizations in this country and they endorsed Romney as a pro-life candidate. The fact that Romney has a squishier pro-life position on rape/incest and “health” of the mother than the RNC platform does not mean he isn’t running as a pro-life candidate with the support of the major pro-life organizations.
This idiotic idea that your spouting that Romney ran against Christianity is just utter nonsense. It’s a flat out lie. You are absolutely lying when you say Romney ran on a pro-abort platform. Christian and pro-life groups all across the nation supported Romney. Overwhelmingly, religious, church going voters supported Romney over Obama.
ansel, your just trying to change the subject anyway. And you had toss out lies to do it. One of the points of this article was that the Tea Party (and movement conservatives) need to be wiser about who we nominate. As the article points out, nominating Christine O’Donnell and dingbats like her was a mistake. You were wrong to support nominating flakes like her. We argued about this years ago and you were wrong then, and you are wrong now - and you’ve clearly lost this argument and might even be smart enough to know it. We left Senate seats on the table because of a lack of political savvy from yourself and people that think like you - that don’t understand how important it is to nominate the most conservative candidate that CAN win (not just the most conservative candidate).
LOL, when any question arises about your agenda, and your obsession against the tea party, and your unshakable defensive, protective posture on Mitt Romney, this thread will serve as a great record of proof.