My agenda is the Buckley Rule - nominate the most conservative candidate that CAN win. Not difficult to figure out. Joke candidates like Christine O' Donnell do not fall into that category. Most thoughtful political analyst and spectators understood she would lose in a landslide and hurt conservatives statewide, people like yourself didn't get that. This article, which is in support of the Tea Party, says the very same thing that I did. I'm sorry you are not capable of critical thought when it comes to these issues, but backing silly candidates that can't win gets us nowhere. Losers like O'Donnell are not even worth using to make a point since they do too much damage to the party and potentially other candidates.
Just about everyone who conservatives put their hopes in today for the future, are tea party candidates.
Your agenda is clear because you are attacking conservatism in general, the tea party’s existence.
There is no election going on, no primary, yet your sole purpose at FR is to constantly harp on the same theme over and over, move left, support rinos, choose rinos, prefer rinos, just get used to thinking in terms of rinos only.
You are on a mission to weaken conservatism, period.
You don’t need to know any names of future candidates, or their qualifications or odds for winning, because your mission never changes, your message is always the same, move left, all you know is that someone in some future race will be more liberal than the other, and those unknown rinos are who you are already fighting for, sight unseen.