Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/23/2013 7:50:57 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
And if you want to watch the full three-part series, they’re all included in this Laffer Curve lesson that I put together for the President. He seems oblivious to real-world evidence, but others may find the information useful.

The purpose of Dem tax policies is not to maximize revenues, but to attempt to maximize control.

2 posted on 01/23/2013 7:54:13 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
We know that people cross state borders all the time, and it’s usually to travel from high-tax states to low-tax states.

Not necessarily. Moochers love high-tax states. There's a reason that California has 10% of the nation's population and over 40% of its welfare cases. And it isn't just the gentle climate.

4 posted on 01/23/2013 8:00:17 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He’s obviously greedy and unwilling to pay his fair share.


6 posted on 01/23/2013 8:13:32 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He’s obviously greedy and unwilling to pay his fair share.


7 posted on 01/23/2013 8:14:06 AM PST by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Politicians (with help from short-sighted voters) can raise tax rates. But they can’t force people to earn income.

Sound more like Atlas Shrugged.

8 posted on 01/23/2013 8:28:11 AM PST by occamrzr06
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Tournament players could go a long way to revealing the cost of confiscatory taxation by refusing to participate in an event in high tax states. If big-brand players only played in tournaments in low tax states, prize funds would shrink at the tourneys with no-name players, and tax revenues would further erode.


9 posted on 01/23/2013 8:29:43 AM PST by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
For the US (as a whole) the Revenue Maximizing Point is around 18%.
10 posted on 01/23/2013 8:49:41 AM PST by 2001convSVT (Going Galt as fast as I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Tax rate of 13.3 = Retirement funds


12 posted on 01/23/2013 10:41:45 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Look at it this way.

The con-artists who infest the legislature of our once-Golden State are spending $2.6 billion for the initial 130-mile segment of the bullet train that will connect the two financial centers (ha!), Madera and Bakersfield.

Clearly, they do not know from where money comes; and do not know what happens to state finances when large sums are squandered.

.

13 posted on 01/23/2013 12:23:30 PM PST by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson