Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CharlesWayneCT
"but your claim...is...offensive,...false and defamatory...this refusal to accept facts clearly presented, and the slander of victims..."

Not to mention...

"Social media users spreading false information about Sandy Hook massacre could face charges, say police"
By Christine Roberts / NEW YORK DAILY NEWS
Sunday, December 16, 2012, 4:17 PM

I'm a little irked, Charles, but will look on the bright side of the show of clowns and other untouchables. There will be a proper investigation later on. I've successfully interviewed lying crooks and helped to bust officious corruption in the past. Don't try to pee-pee on my leg.


94 posted on 01/23/2013 1:53:51 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]


To: familyop

Are you seriously worried that they’ll actually be able to file charges against people for false information?

The Internet wouldn’t survive if they government could actually put a stop to false information.

We can’t possibly hope not to stop the nuts of the world from posting ridiculous claims. We don’t have to help them by giving them a pass when they make ridiculous claims.

Like claiming that Robbie Parker is actually someone else.


98 posted on 01/23/2013 5:15:19 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson