Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colonel_Flagg
RE :”Too, the GOP continuing to stack the primary process with states who either don’t vote Republican for President (Iowa) and states generally but not always inclined to moderation (New Hampshire) doesn’t help either.”

Also had the problem that in 2011 there were all these other candidates who spent all their time beating up on each other until there were only 2+Romney left.

And you couldn't even get agreement here on who to pick, none of them stood out.

And there were also make believe candidates who had no intention of running. Right there that was a early sign of coming disaster.

90 posted on 01/22/2013 10:30:48 AM PST by sickoflibs (Losing to O is NO principle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs
And you couldn't even get agreement here on who to pick, none of them stood out.

The GOP needs two strong conservative candidates declared and before the public prior to Iowa, with an agreement between the two that the loser drops out to unify the base. I know, as long as I'm dreaming I'd like a pony too, but the idea would be to have a unified, base-friendly candidate to take on the Christies and Jeb Bushes of the world. I don't see any other way to field a conservative candidate at a time when the Republic will need one more than ever.

This last election cycle, I voted for conservatives only and if the GOP wants my vote they will need to earn it by nominating a candidate acceptable to the base.

105 posted on 01/22/2013 11:40:07 AM PST by Colonel_Flagg ("Don't be afraid to see what you see." -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson