The only thing I agree with is that birtherism is nonsense.
bttt
Suborned in the U.S.A.
The birth-certificate controversy is about Obama’s honesty, not where he was born.
By Andrew C. McCarthy
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmJhMzlmZWFhOTQ3YjUxMDE2YWY4ZDMzZjZlYTVmZmU=&w=MA
<>
July 30, 2009
Obama’s birth certificate and the real issues
Thomas Lifson
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2009/07/obamas_birth_certificate_and_t.html
Well requiring that Presidents prove they are eligible to be president as specified by the constitution is not nonsense. I don’t know what powell is talking about. There has not been much honest dialogue about obama’s eligibility.
I don’t agree with any of “sides” on this topic. One side says its obvious he is not eligible. Another side says the opposite. Stil another conservative faction thinks it’s a lose/losse proposition so why waste the ammo
I disagree with all of them. I don’t know about obama specifically and its not about obama. My concern is there is no process to check eligibility and a lousy precedent has been established. The issue has been badly politicized. This means anyone can get in if they can get the votes. I want the rule of law upheld and let the chips fall where they may.