Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grundle

This doesn’t change the fact that *no* Federal employee,past or present...elected,appointed or civil service...should have armed protection of *any* sort.And that goes for the family members of any such employee.


29 posted on 01/20/2013 7:10:49 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Red State Secession Is The Only Answer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Gay State Conservative

I disagree. Any federal employee who has a reasonable risk of being a target of terrorists based on their job within the government should have an armed guard to protect them.

We don’t leave our own hanging out to dry. You might as well claim that our troops shouldn’t be allowed to carry guns.


58 posted on 01/20/2013 7:41:21 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson