To: Lonesome in Massachussets
Read the British warning again. It merely states that if you later offer a defense at trial based on facts that could have been offered at the time of arrest, your failure to assert this defense at the time of arrest can, correctly in my opinion, be weighed by the jury in determining the facts in the case. Its just common sense.The only common-sense conclusion one can draw from that situation is that your lawyer chose your defense poorly. Exactly how does having a bad attorney become an indicator of guilt?
156 posted on
01/22/2013 2:11:31 AM PST by
Teacher317
('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
To: Teacher317
You are either not paying attention or don’t want to listen.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson