One place in California that ought to be totally devoid of kids is San Francisco. No parent who loves his children should ever want to so much as visit the city with his kids.
But liberals have been cheering about the declining (white) birth rate.
Fiji, You are an absolute MORON! There are lots of areas of San Francisco where people raise their children successfully in decent neighborhoods. I don’t know what rock you live under but your moronic rhetoric suggests that it may be a place where the plumbing is outdoors.
That is an ignorant statement. The city is cosmopolitan and diverse. Although known for it's queers and assh*le politicians, the outer neighborhoods have normal family folks. One of my daughters lives in the Richmond district alongside GG Park with her husband and baby. Her choice, to be close to her tech job. The district is filled with baby strollers and children. The Sunset district has chinese families with kids. The outer Mission district has mexican and filipino families with kids. The Castro district has the queers and faggots, but is just one of many districts, although they are the loudest and most obnoxious. San Francisco did not even make the top of the list of gayest cities, that title passed on several years ago. I doubt that SF will soon return to being a republican city, which it was for more than half of the 20th century. But some normal people live here.
I visited San Francisco as a kid and loved it, but that was back in the days when it had a Republican mayor--in other words, a long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away. The last time I was there, a couple years ago, it reminded me of NYC in the late 1970's or Los Angeles in the early 1990's, with all of the bums and "street people" slouching on the street corners, side walks and median strips.