Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rockrr
It’s really nothing more than a strawman to talk about what Lincoln said, implied, or thought about slavery because HE DID NOT INSTIGATE THE WAR.

Of course it is, it does not fit into your narative. Why would he have said such things if he was willing to go to war for such a noble cause. Really doesn't compute does it!!!

The seminal reason for the friction between the north and south, the sectionalism that resulted, and the souths instigating open warfare against their own country was the institution of slavery.

Less than 1% of the south benefitted from slavery. It is just simply wrong to say it went to war for that reason. And Lincoln's own words tell us it wasn't worth going to war for him.

68 posted on 01/21/2013 10:20:13 AM PST by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: ontap

Because Lincoln didn’t go to war to protect slavery or to outlaw it - he went to war as a result of the souths actions. The south went to war to protect slavery. Lincoln went to war to protect the nation.


69 posted on 01/21/2013 10:42:51 AM PST by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: ontap

The 1% even then! And the other 99% of dumb white southerners did the fighting and dying. Is it any wonder the symbol of the Democrats is a jackass!


74 posted on 01/21/2013 11:37:30 AM PST by jmacusa (Political correctness is cultural Marxism. I'm not a Marxist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson