Posted on 01/19/2013 8:53:03 AM PST by Kaslin
Here’s a very illuminating example from Norway while the islamics were pushing for 8and got, to some degree) gag orders against public criticism.
TV-program, one of the well-known conservatives against a local cair lookalike. The conservative cited numbers, what really happens with muslim terror. Just statistics.
The muslim claimed that since arguments like that could not be defended against, they have to be silenced.
In your face.
Nonsense, why does fail to mention vote fraud?
True. On the flip side, if we aren't smart enough to vote against Obama, we might as well just curl up in a ball and wait for the meds nurse to come by with the cart of "happinesss". Oh nurse....
The evangelical vote must have been black evangelicals.
but hey! As long as the morons keep getting their obamaphones, they'll be happy.
Egggsactly! Look at the number of precincts or counties that voted 90 plus percent or even OVER 100 percent for Obama. This election would have been close except for the Chicago style, Communist Union backed thievery that was employed to insure the Kenyan/Marxists re-election. Romney never had a prayer against such tactics and just for the record neither will any but a "Progressive" candidate in the next election should Obama consent to allow one.
Because he’s a numbers guy, and there are no numbers available on total vote fraud.
Is this true, does anyone know anything about this?
I like what you did there.
With Obama POTUS is actually a POS and we should consistently designate him as such.
And SCOTUS is mostly SCROTUMLESS other than Scalia, Thomas and Alito! We are SOL if Kennedy and Ginsburg dump in the next 4 years. At least (the McCainesque) Kennedy promised to wait until this POS was out.
Voter fraud had definitely a lot to do with it. Also that 0bama was planning to steal the election from the beginning. Why was he so sure that he was going to get reelected? It would not have mattered who our candidate was. Of course on the other side the divisions on our side did not help us either
Not that I know of. There were plenty of straight 100's (59 / 1500 in Philly) but none over 100. No 140% turnout either, only 70% times a two page ballot.
On the flip side, if we aren't smart enough to vote FOR a believer in a known heresy...
60 million American babies have been kill because of this postition.
View Mitt’s pro-abortion ad here:
The spot features a disappointed former Obama supporter who does a little of the ol Google thing and learns that Mitt Romney doesnt oppose contraception at all and thinks abortion should be an option in cases of rape, incest, or to save a mothers life.
http://vox-nova.com/2012/10/19/mitt-romneys-pro-choice-ad/
Also bearing in mind that the actual swearing-in is tomorrow in a private ceremony, and will most likely be done on a koran or a little red book.
It is ever more clear just what a disaster that you guys brought to the GOP and conservatism and America.
Why in God’s name did you work so hard to get a candidate who couldn’t even defeat Jimmy Carter the second?
But after Romney was nominated, I voted for him. A stay-home was equivalent to a vote for Obama.
Would Romney have called for an ''assault'' weapons ban and then use federal agencies to enforce his will while breaking the law? I doubt it.
Would Romney have called for and gotten tax-hikes and $43 of new spending for every $1 in tax-cuts? I doubt it.
Would Romney have allowed Obamacare to stand? I doubt it.
I could go on and on. Yes, Romney sucked. But he was nowhere near as bad as Obama. Nowhere.
Here you are still hacking for Romney, countering criticism of him, protecting and defending the choice, as others want to make sure that such an insanity is not again visited on us.
Four years away from the next presidential election, and instead of working to hammer home the disaster of nominating such a freakish and bizarre candidate you are working to defend the choice, to keep the possibility of a repeat, alive.
And you really don’t want to learn the facts about Assault Weapons bans and Mitt Romney.
Also bearing in mind that the actual swearing-in is tomorrow in a private ceremony, and will most likely be done on a koran or a little red book.
You have insight into all kinds of things!
Remember the mantra: "The OTHER conservatives we vote for will hold Mitt's feet to the fire and make him go the right direction.
Well; where ARE they??
All I see now is a Conservative group that is rubbing the Emperors feet by the hearth, soothing them with appeasement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.