Im so sorry to have offended you. I thought it was considered very bad form and outright rude not to ping the person on whose post I was replying. I was once roundly admonished here when I included a quote by another poster and inadvertently failed to ping them. I guess you play by other rules of your own making.
But I think I get it now. You are allowed to publish your own views and that is perfectly OK, but anyone posting anything in answer to you who is not 100% in lock step with your opinion is just using it as means to publish their own views. If you go back and read my original post BTW, it was not an admonishment of homeschooling, something I did not say I was against nor did it have anything to do with rape in schools. Again, you seem to be confusing me with another poster and have a serious reading comprehension problem and a problem dealing with anyone who disagrees with you, even in the slightest.
Perhaps you did not fully read both posts and inadvertently pinged me about chips. It's fast and furious here in Free Republic. I have done that on more than one occasion.
I do not object to chips in private or government businesses. Some parents may want them for their children. That’s OK by me.
It is my personal **opinion** that if a school has such a HUGE student population that chips are needed to keep kids safe, and that the children are not known by the staff and other students, then that school is too big to be safe. Children should not be under police and court threat by the government to attend such a school, nor should the taxpayers be under police threat to pay for it.