Posted on 01/18/2013 9:01:18 PM PST by Steelfish
Maybe now Albert Gore JUNIOR, crazed sex poodle, can afford to pay for a massage that comes with a “happy ending”.
I AM a capitalist - an investor actually, and in point of fact I have been a vocal opponent of certain stock options deals that I've seen doled out to the uninvolved, like board members, for example. For executives, on the other hand, stock options can be a very effective motivator.
In this case, we don't know how Gore come into these options. He might have bought them (well, it is possible) as likely as not. If the options were provided by Apple as part of his compensation as a board member, then I would not have approved, were I an investor in Apple. But, I'm not, and therefore it is not a matter of concern for me.
How about salaries? Should they also be illegal? Aren't they payoffs as well?
How about YOUR salary?
Me, too. Actually, even though retired, I possess significant options in a Canadian listed company, granted to me as part compensation in my capacity as a consultant.
However, when options are granted to those who bring to the table only their government connections, I have trouble justifying this ethically.
Just as all real world socialism is some form of national socialism, so all real world capitalist systems turn out to be some form of crony capitalism. This is all a matter of particular historical and intellectual interest to me, whatever the shyster-crafted legalities might detail.
I don’t get “preferred” stock offers from IPO’s because I’m not an insider. What the hell does that have to do with salaries?
That you have to ask this question at all proves my point. We have a lot of people on this forum who don't understand much of business or economics.
What do stock options (not "stock offers") have to do with salaries, you ask?
Stock options are a common component of executive compensation, which typically consists of a direct payment component, a fringe benefit component, and a stock options component. Ideally, the stock options should vest only upon the successfully meeting one or more pre-established criteria such as a defined net income or market share, or the achievement of a specific task, such as successfully completing certain development milestones.
Occasionally, stock options are granted to board members as part of their compensation packages. This is a practice which has attracted some well-deserved criticism. Better, in my opinion to restrict board members to cash compensation.
I hope this answers your question, at least in part.
He was given a preferred option someone like you and me could never get for basically nothing. Unless you can show what value he added to the company other than his access to “the system” then I’ve proven MY point. It’s a payoff.
Frankly, I’m sick and tired of our so-called representatives using their influence, access and ways around the law (I wonder how above board the SEC would think the deal was) to enrich themselves. It’s like the fact, for some reason I don’t believe is lawful, Congress can exempt themselves from insider trading.
It all stinks. I don’t care if it looks above board. And it’s hypocritical since Gore and his ilk attack anyone else for the same so-called compensation.
I understand your explanation and did from the start. I agree with you that it should be scrutinized more closely. I bet the SEC would jump on a company that just willy-nilly put anyone “on the board” and give them large compensation packages.
Mitt Romney gets criticized for being on boards and I bet he actually gives something in return.
BTW, I have a degree in economics also (yeah, that pays the bills) and that “science” really hasn’t got much to do with compensation per say. A lot of the shift to those forms of compensation, ironically, increased when the Clinton tax bill of 1993 limited corporate salary write-offs to $1 million a year.
Again, it stinks. And I won’t take the condenscending tone personally! :)
That was a joke!
another good reason not to buy stuff from crapple. Never have and never will
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.