Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: centurion316
So the L-3 uses RF versus the back-scatter xray, as I understand.

Does L-3 offer reduced/eliminated skin cancer risk from uncalibrated back-scatter machines?

39 posted on 01/18/2013 10:54:49 AM PST by grobdriver (Sic semper tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: grobdriver

Short answer is yes. Backscatter is X-Ray and some in the medical field claim that any X-Ray energy represents risk, even though we all get X-Rays at the doctors’ and the dentist. This just adds to that mix.

L3 system operates in a different band on the spectrum and I haven’t heard any of the smart guys say that they had any safety concerns. I am not an expert, but the experts that I have talked to haven’t expressed concerns.

I travel frequently and have metal knees. I avoid the magnetometer whenever I can and pick the L3 whenever I can. I do go through the Rapidscan when I have to. (KC only has Rapidscan, so I use that outbound. Most return trips I can use a L3 machine.

The Rapidscan machine is the flat panel that you turn and face. The L3 machine is the one where you stand in a cylinder and the scanner revolves around you.


40 posted on 01/18/2013 11:03:31 AM PST by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson