This just in: The ad didn't attack Obama's daughters at all, it attacked Obama's hypocrisy in seeking protection for them, but not for other children. That isn't an attack against the daughters.
coloradan ~ :” The ad didn’t attack Obama’s daughters at all, it attacked Obama’s hypocrisy in seeking protection for them, but not for other children. That isn’t an attack against the daughters.”
Lib’s don’t understand hypocrisy ~ they are too busy living it !
You can’t spell it out to them ~ too much kool-aide
There was a reason why the mayors father took him out to New Mexico / Arizona : to appreciate the responsibility of markmanship and gun ownership
Markmanship to know where the round was going to go
Responsibility to know how to harness the power of the firearm
Nowadays , our kids shoot in an online virtual world where they come back alive in 10 -15 seconds ; no harm / no foul !
This virtual world desensitizes personal responsibility to those whom they shoot , and may kill , because they come back alive an willing to fight as soon as they rejuvenate .
The only harm the NRA did was to show that OBama and his kids are ‘elitist’ ~ entitled by their position of prominance to certain protections, not afforded to the common citizen’s children .
Comforts which our kids do not have
That’s all .. no more / no less .
Good job , NRA !!
That hardly matters. Human beings are naturally irrational, or moreso than they are rational. Most of us long to be as irrational as possible. And this is one of those cases where we grant license to be so, despite the truth.