Getting the truth out is always important, no?
Additionally, if there is some personal redemption for Armstrong is starts with admitting his faults.
Also this involves cycling as a major sport. Where the UCI involved in covering this up, major sponsors?
Who had the motivation to destroy the golden boy of the sport, who singlehandedly put cycling on the map in the United States.
That's NOTHING compared to Obama. Just go back to the second presidential debate. Anyway...
But what difference does it really make? Whatever he says, the people who hate him will say he is lying.