Once again, the NRA isn’t disputing protection for Obama’s kids.
Obama is rejecting the NRA’s suggestion of protection for other kids.
The NRA’s point is why does Obama see guards for others’ schools as being “inappropriate”.
OK Obama’s kids have greatly enhanced security needs. But some schools have a thousand kids or more. Less risk individually, but a lot of kids to protect.
Why are the opinions of three talking heads “breaking news”?
So true Bulba-
Obama chose to be President which comes with inherent risks and yes-his kids need protection-and they will NOT be targeted because everyone knows they are protected...
But these children just went to school with homework and lunches-expecting to yawn thru math and play with their friends at recess-just simply, it doesn’t matter who their parents are or what they do, they ALL have targets on their backs because they are not protected- by anyone with a weapon who can return fire...
A teacher shielded 6 children using her body to protect them; she was killed as were the 6 she was trying to save-but if she could have protected them with a gun, things may have been different....
it is so stunningly simple that the elitists cannot fathom it.