1 posted on
01/16/2013 3:29:37 AM PST by
dennisw
To: dennisw
Riviera Beach hacks had a long running grudge with this guy, tried to screw him because they despised him. Too bad these lo-IQ hacks will not have their assets taken to pay this upcoming judgement. Taxpayers will have to pick up the tab for their evil actions
2 posted on
01/16/2013 3:32:34 AM PST by
dennisw
(The first principle is to find out who you are then you can achieve anything -- Buddhist monk)
To: dennisw
In deciding the case, the high court struck down lower court rulings that turned on a simple concept that if it floats, it’s a boat.
I thought the saying is something to the effect of “IF it floats it’s a witch”.
4 posted on
01/16/2013 4:21:03 AM PST by
freedomfiter2
(Brutal acts of commission and yawning acts of omission both strengthen the hand of the devil.)
To: dennisw
I hope he gets reimbursed for those legal fees. If not, I don’t consider it a win for him........
7 posted on
01/16/2013 4:44:12 AM PST by
Hot Tabasco
(Jab her with a harpoon or just throw her from the train......)
To: dennisw
Lozman said on FOX that he paid property taxes on the house, something not charged to a vessel, so, in levying property taxes on the house the city tacitly agreed it was not a vessel but rather real estate.
8 posted on
01/16/2013 5:20:50 AM PST by
Mister Da
(The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
To: dennisw
I seem to have missed an important detail. Why did the city seize his home? I don’t suppose it really matters as far as the outcome, and yet somehow it seems like there is a gaping hole where that detail belongs.
9 posted on
01/16/2013 5:27:29 AM PST by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson