Skip to comments.
Rep. Nadler: Two to Four Self-Defense Shots is Enough
Breitbart News ^
| 1/15/13
| Kerry Picket
Posted on 01/15/2013 7:17:52 PM PST by paltz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-123 last
To: paltz
If anyone doubts that these people are AT WAR with the American people, this should change their minds. What this asshat means is that you won't need more than 3 rounds when Janet's Brownshirts come for you. You're going to get taken out early, so why take the chance you could injure one of her jackbooted DHS thugs?
This is not about crime. Everyone should stop at once responding to this kind of crap (spouted by fascist morons) as if it were. The ONLY response is "the 2nd amendment guarantees us the right to protect ourselves from the government". He can take his crime argument and shove it.....deep.
121
posted on
01/16/2013 1:07:41 PM PST
by
ChildOfThe60s
(If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: paltz
Four shots would be far to few to take down Jerry. Maybe an elephant gun could do it in two shots.
To: paltz
Nadler’s primary concern is that citizens can’t kill more than one or two of his constituents at a time, otherwise they’d have to work harder to steal elections.
123
posted on
01/16/2013 6:47:51 PM PST
by
PLMerite
(Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-123 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson