[potlatch]

I’m not usually a conspiratory believer but there are too many oddities in this whole event.

As of November 30, 2012, Sandy Hook Elementary School had 456 children enrolled in kindergarten through fourth grade. According to school authorities, the school’s security protocol had recently been upgraded, requiring visitors to be individually admitted after visual and identification review by video monitor.

No pictures have been shown and a ‘mask’ was mentioned early on. Why have we seen only one single picture of children - the one of teachers leading them with their eyes closed, supposedly, since they were holding on to each other’s shoulders. Even overhead photos never showed any children near the school or the firehouse.

They said he had four guns, including a shotgun that was left in the back of the vehicle. The rifle used was a Bushmaster .223-caliber, and yet we’ve seen videos of them opening the trunk and finding that rifle in the dark of night.

But, the coroner ‘on video’ says all the children were shot with the rifle!

Who was the man they were shown, on video, chasing in the woods? I don’t believe it was the Father, who went there to make gingerbread men with his son...

[potlatch]

conspiratory = conspiracy
[they’re plotting against my posts....snicker]

[concerned about politics]

I’m not usually a conspiratory believer but there are too many oddities in this whole event.

Yep. Hillary signed the UN Small Arms Treaty that wants the name of every gun owner in America, and suddenly medicated boys are out shooting people. Two more today at two colleges.
People know something smells fishy. They're just not sure what it is.

People can sense things. The democrats need gun deaths to get their UN treaty completed, and out of the blue, they're getting all they need - right on schedule. What are the odds this would be happening "naturally"?

[Uncle Chip]

Here — this might help you:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ptbd6qRY358

[CharlesWayneCT]

Nothing you mentioned was an oddity. They are all normal things. I have no idea why you think they are "odd". Or why you can insist on "facts" for which you have no evidence whatsoever.

For example, why would it be weird if there was only one shot of the kids being led out? They are all small children, and remarkably maybe the media is still relatively good about some types of privacy. And the area was cordoned off and controlled by the police, so it's not like there was a bunch of people with cameras there ready to shoot pictures.

On the other hand, there isn't just one picture either.

For example:

There are dozens of pictures of kids and their parents leaving the school. You remember one because it is the one that best conveys the image of kids evacuating the school, so it's the one used the most. Doesn't mean it is the only picture.

And there is actually a video of the kids being led out, from which it appears the iconic picture is cut.

The kids were taken down a closed road to the firehouse, and kept inside away from cameras, so most pictures are of kids being led away with their kids.

I watched a couple videos from that day, and you see kids being led around. The school was in lockdown, and they were not evacuating anybody. It would be easy to wait until you have school buses, and take the kids out the back and down the street to the firehouse.

If you watch the vids, you'll see that the school is isolated, and the only way out is past the firehouse. Most everybody including the press were kept out by the firehouse, and most of the video and pictures are from there. Only a couple reporters were close enough to the school (that's where we get the evacuation picture people see), and they well could have been told not to take pictures of the kids.

The people on the scene reported that there were waves of kids; the picture is then meant to be representative of that.

What is the point of the question, btw? Are you suggesting that there were no kids at the school? Do you think there are NOT 20 dead kids? If not, do you think that someone picked 20 kids, put them in the school, and let the rest stay home, and that 600 families are all complicit in this?

Exactly WHAT part of the conspiracy is fed by this question of the evacuation of the kids?

The unanswered questions are all on the part of the people pushing the conspiracy. They just throw a lot of questions around, and let people assume that "questions" means something bad.

Which is why we have to ask -- what is the point. Do you think there were no evacuations? Do you think there were no kids at the school? Do you think they were all killed? What is the conspiracy?

[CharlesWayneCT]

Video of child describing evacuation

Here is a video interviewing a child who evacuated -- her evacuation was a "run" she says to the fire house.

Many of the videos mention that the kids have all been evacuated already; they were held in lockdown, but the reports were from later in the morning.