Yes, this is part of the narrative that involves “I think” and other suppositions. The mortar of this narrative began to crumble at many places in the first week after the event and since that time, much patching of the story has taken place.
And the explanations are always...sensible.
But why so much defense of this narrative on FR in face of FReepers expressing desire for much more information, not just persuasion. See what I’m saying? A newsjockey doing a stand-up report in front of a location does not constitute evidence of anything other than he/she has a job.
No, this is part of the account