Congress has at least a moral obligation to provide funding for the spending bills they enact.
What moral obligation & what funding? 40% of every dollar that the U.S. federal gubmint spends is borrowed money. There's no "moral obligation" to spend money which the gubmint does not have. That's not immoral, that is the plain common sense truth. It is grossly immoral to saddle more debt on top of future generations. You can't spend yourself into prosperity.
We need to CUT $1 Trillion in spending in 2013 and another $1 Trillion on top of that in 2014, simply to just balance the spending against the revenue (Taxpayer money that is. The gubmint doesn't create or generate one penny of revenure on its own).
“they”???
Which “they”?
Nancy’s 2010 congress that enacted obamacare?
The Senate hasn’t passed a budget since 2009, which contained HUGE spending increases, with the intent of forming a baseline for continued HUGE spending levels.
This is a new congress, which has NO “moral obligation” to fund ANY of this crap!