Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

Butter, Have you read the legal posting by Paul Guthrie in which he defines “natural born citizen”? This goes on for a bit, but is worth reading. The birth certificate thing is not going anywhere. Maybe approach this from a different angle?
After four years of this, I finally understand what “color blind” really means. Really concerned if he is exposed he’ll pull the “real dad” trick out of his hat which would of course make him a citizen if “dad” is FM Davis.

DEFINITIONS SECTION

PROOF OF THE DEFINITION OF natural born Citizen
PART I Natural Law Theory of the Father

(fact)44) “We the People” created the Constitution. (see Constitution)
45) The Constitution creates the three branches of government. (see Constitution)
46) “We the People” are the male and female citizens of the United States. (natural fact)
47) The male and female citizens represent the Natural Law jurisdiction of government. (natural fact)
48) By deduction due to the defined facts of law in 47, and by a and d

in PART III of the definitions section below, the three branches, Executive, Legislative, and Judicial, represent the Positive Law jurisdiction of government. (fact by definition in a, d,below and 47, above)49) Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 of the United Sates Constitution bans Titles of Nobility, Federal.50) Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution bans Titles of Nobility, State.20

51) 49 and 50 operate on 47 to prevent:a) Congress, Executive and Judicial branches from applying the positive law authority of 48 to declare the offspring of U.S. State citizen male fathers and foreign female mothers to be either a naturalized U.S. citizen of a foreign country, or from being natural born Citizens (U.S. natives) that are also natives of a foreign country or foreign state. This prevents a male U.S. citizen or U.S. President from acting like a King who can create rulers of foreign political societies via his offspring to foreign females. This binds the male citizen and his offspring to the father’s U.S. citizenship, making the male U.S. citizen’s choice in female with which to produce offspring irrelevant for Article II natural born Citizen status. This ensures that native U.S. citizen males from the States can only create membership for their offspring to be in U.S. society that is inherited as a natural right claim of sovereign political authority from their U.S. State citizen father. (logical fact) b) Congress, Executive and Judicial branches from applying the positive law authority of 48 to declare the offspring of a U.S. State citizen female mother and foreign male father to be natural born

21 Citizens that can be President. This prevents the female citizen from acting like a Queen.

This binds the female citizen and her offspring to US citizenship via the male U.S. citizen father and his State citizenship in order for her offspring to be considered
natural born

U.S. citizens that can be President. Also, it protects the female mother’s choice in what country she wants to create natural born citizens by protecting her choice and the political rights of the native males of her society from the consequences of rape by a foreign male.(logical fact)52) Mr. Obama is the offspring of a U.S. citizen mother and foreign father, making him a naturalized-at-birth U.S. citizen (Positive Law only,adopted citizen), the opposite of a natural born U.S. Citizen. (Natural Law only, born to a U.S. citizen father from a State, inherited right of citizenship ) (natural fact)53) Due to 49, 50, 51, 52 above, Obama is not a natural born Citizen and is barred by the Constitution from serving as President and has no natural right or legal right claim to that Office. (logical deduction natural fact)22


81 posted on 01/16/2013 7:43:14 PM PST by Pandoras Box
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: Pandoras Box

All of this is nice, but the “failed to qualify” argument from the requirements of the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three is an easier standard to prove. What was our Congress shown as proof of eligibility? None of them can answer this question. If any of them cite the already proven fraudulent documents, they are subject to charges of treason. They, Congress, can’t answer the question. If they can’t answer the question, the Twentieth Amendment, Section Three tells us that there has been a “failure to qualify”. There is no legal President at this time. Get Congress to admit it.


82 posted on 01/16/2013 8:04:32 PM PST by Uncle Sham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson