[justiceseeker93]

Even if we were to assume, for the sake of argument, that Onaka is telling Bennett the truth with respect to Obama's place of birth, being a "Natural Born Citizen" carries with it the additional requirement that both of one's parents are citizens of the US at the time of one's birth. It is beyond controversy that Barack Obama II's father, as reported by Onaka to Bennett, was NEVER an American citizen at all. Thus, Barack Obama II is not a "Natural Born Citizen" within the definition of that term as universally understood by the Constitution's framers. (A "Natural Born Citizen," BTW, is a higher standard than a "citizen at birth" or a "citizen by birth.")

It doesn't take a constitutional genius to conclude, therefore, that Barack Obama II is constitutionally ineligible to serve as President.

[Nero Germanicus]

If we could find just one judge anywhere in America to agree with you.
Six state and federal courts have ruled that Obama IS a natural born citizen:
Tisdale v Obama-US District Court Eastern District of Virginia
Rhodes v MacDonald-US District Court Middle District of Georgia
Taitz v Obama (Quo Warranto)-US District Court for the District of Columbia
Allen v Obama-Arizona Superior Court for Pima County
Ankeny v Governor Daniels-Indiana Court of Appeals
Farrar-Swensson-Powell & Welden v Obama-Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings & Georgia Fulton County Superior Court.

This is important because judges are prone to follow the precedents established in earlier trials on the exact same issue. There needs to be some decisions to counter-balance these pro-Obama decisions.

[Mr. Know It All]

being a "Natural Born Citizen" carries with it the additional requirement that both of one's parents are citizens of the US at the time of one's birth

This is not true. This has never been true. This was invented by people twisting various court rulings. The actual court rulings that apply do not have a "two-parent" requirement.