If true, the paper should be held criminally liable.
Lawsuit.
Hey now, let’s not forget, when a liberal makes a map its for the “Common good” therefore they are not responsible for what they do, liberals are never responsible for anything
In colonial times the newspaper editor and the writer would have been tarred and feathered!
I doubt there’s any way they can be found CRIMINALLY liable... but... pain and suffering caused by their irresponsible actions?
One can easily imagine the scene in some liability attorney’s office tomorrow morning: “Ashley, would you get me a phone number for these folks who just got their home broken into?”
Enough examples of that might put a company completely out of business. Just sayin’.
I mean, it seems to me these are consequences that could have been reasonably foreseen by anyone with one eye and half sense.
As well as its advertisers and subscribers.
“Send Lawyers Guns and money...the $&!7 Has hit the fan! HEY!”
I’d say the journal should be treated as a conspirator like someone who cases a bank.
This paper is part of the Gannett communist propaganda network. Why dont the parent organizations ever face any scrutiny when one of the outlets goes really rogue?
If the owner of your local McDonalds starting putting razor blades on sandwiches instead of pickles then McD HQ would be, rightly or wrongly, drawn into the issue immediately. How is it then that a paper can use its product to knowingly and willfully attempt to aggitate for and instigate burglaries, rapes and murders but the situation is just treated as a local problem?
Its not as though this is the first time this kind of thing has happened so why isnt anyone asking those on the top of this dung pile why it is allowed to happen and why arent they the ones paying the piper?
Publish the addresses of the newspaper staff and remind people that it is likely that cash, jewelry, and other valuable are likely present in these homes and that the owners are likely to be unarmed.