[CharlesWayneCT]

The claim that a particular count of votes is a “mathematical and statistical impossibility” is false.

You want to say it is unlikely? Go ahead. But neither statistics nor mathematics would disprove a particular outcome.

You might as well say that flipping a coin 100 times and never coming up tails is “impossible”.

Sadly, too many people have never paid attention to what is happening in the inner city; there are places where nobody would ever vote republican.

[Shery]

I understand that in many inner cities there are those who would never vote republican. However, when more than 100% of the registered voters vote, it leads one to suspect that some voted a lot more than once, as Obama, himself suggested his voter do. Democrats may break the law, but if a republican was heard to tell his/her voters to do the same thing, they’d be forced to resign. We have double standard and if we do not FIX this double standard, we are also part of the problem.

Having lived in NYC, and Bedford Stuyvesant at that, there were still people who voted republican. There were many independents. There were MANY CPUSA. So, for one person to get 100% or above is ludicrous. PERIOD. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to tell you that these numbers ARE fraudulent.

[cripplecreek]

Sadly, too many people have never paid attention to what is happening in the inner city; there are places where nobody would ever vote republican.

In places like Detroit, the fraud is so institutionalized that it doesn't even take an organized effort. The people know how they're expected to vote and the ballot counters know what the outcome has to be. No one has to tell them or encourage them, its just the machine on auto pilot.

[PLMerite]

“Sadly, too many people have never paid attention to what is happening in the inner city; there are places where nobody would ever vote republican.”

Not intentionally, perhaps. But considering how low the IQ of a “Low IQ Voter” is, someone would do it by accident.