Chief Nulty Says Journal News Endangers Undercover Officers,

Rockland County Times ^ | 1/12/13 | ROBERT KNIGHT

[Impala64ssa]

One abstention one this resolution, Democratic Supervisor Andrew Stewart, who "wanted more time to study the issue, and the wording of the actual resolution." The fallout continues, especially as the law of unintended consequences becomes apparent, the potential impact on national security and terrorism. Calling the Urinal-Spews staff foolish and naïve would be too kind.

[onyx]

Liberals never concern themselves with consequences, intended or otherwise. Their anti-gun or pro-abortion agenda overrides everything.

[Slings and Arrows]

I wonder if there’s some way we can sic the Westboro Baptist Church on the Journal-News?

[Morris70]

Read article twice.
My understanding , under cover cops posing as “bad guys” would only have guns illegally .
Flagging them as having permits , shows their not who they say they are.
First hunch is they’re cops by the bad guys.

I thought police didn’t have permits.

[meadsjn]

Liberals never concern themselves with consequences, intended or otherwise. Their anti-gun or pro-abortion agenda overrides everything.

Both those liberal agenda result in the deaths of innocents.

Fairly makes my case that liberals are just plain unadulterated evil.

[vette6387]

“I wonder if there’s some way we can sic the Westboro Baptist Church on the Journal-News?”

Tell them that the J-N Staff are all gay!

[WildHighlander57]

For the undercover guys/gals, maybe that’s part of their “cover”.

[Morris70]

Then I don’t understand how the news article hurts them.
I guess I’ll figure it out later. No worries.

[onyx]

I concur with you.

[Slings and Arrows]

Might not even be a lie.

[Theoria]

He's an idiot. It was always the law that the names were public information. The media just did the work.

The problem is the 'permit' not the news publishing public info.

The Chief is attacking the press, instead of trying to remove the permit process, so every American can have a handgun in their house without first asking permission from the King.

[wastedyears]

Why would they need permits?

[DaveA37]

Can this be done? Sue the idiots who wrote the article and the newspaper for “endangerment” to the police officers.

Contrary to what those who believe the police only shoot dogs do, the policemen’s jobs are stressful enough without adding to it.

[1010RD]

Smash their presses and shut them down. Sue them to poverty.

[Wonder Warthog]

"Why would they need permits?"

Although the police automatically "have permits" for their duty weapons, I believe most (if not all) cops also have personally owned firearms that they keep at home for the defense of their families and themselves in "off-duty" hours. Of course, the requirement for "permits" varies widely by geography.

[DemforBush]

Y’know, I had never even considered the aspect of undercover police officers being “outed” by that stupid “gun map”

I’m wondering now just how many undercover investigations have been potentially compromised by the arrogance of those idiots at the Journal News. On top of all the private citizens who already have also been put at risk, of course.

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks Impala64ssa.

Undercover officers, some who pose as “bad guys” that should not be allowed to have a pistol permit, outed by their own local newspaper.

The Other Shoe Drops ping.

[Zuben Elgenubi]

safety of all local undercover officers regardless

My god, how many undercover cops are there?

[Mr. Silverback]

In some states a cop has to get a carry permit in order to carry off-duty.

[Truth29]

"I wonder if there’s some way we can sic the Westboro Baptist Church on the Journal-News?"

How about a no knock dynamic entry search of the newspaper HQ along with the homes of the editor and publisher to determine if there are any improper links and payments from third party sources?