Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

No, I am saying that the federal government doesn’t have to go along with it. If there is reason for the feds to arrest, say an illegal alien, and he is a pot dealer - then that guy is in violation of federal law.


36 posted on 01/12/2013 6:29:15 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL
No, I am saying that the federal government doesn’t have to go along with it. If there is reason for the feds to arrest, say an illegal alien, and he is a pot dealer - then that guy is in violation of federal law.

You are too wampy to admit you are giving the fedgov powers not enumerated to them.

I see I am dealing with yet another so-called conservative who wants the fedgov to have powers not enumerated to them, as long as the usurped powers pleases them.

Ta-ta, point made.

37 posted on 01/12/2013 6:33:00 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: GeronL
If there is reason for the feds to arrest, say an illegal alien, and he is a pot dealer - then that guy is in violation of federal law.

OK, an American citizen is growing pot in their own basement for their own use. No commerce, let alone interstate commerce, involved.

Please show where in the Constitution the feds have the enumerated power to say that person cannot do such, especially when their state such as Colorado under the 10th has said they are legally OK - under state law - to do such.

And please, answer the question without falling back on unrelated topics such as illegal immigration.

38 posted on 01/12/2013 6:37:04 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson