From the comments: “People who are fearful and paranoid are the exact people I do not want to have firearms. I want potential gun owners to be asked, “Why do you want a gun.?” If the answer is, “To protect my family,” the next question should be, “From whom?” “Why do you think you need an assault weapon?” Please provide five specific reasons.
If the person cannot provide sane, reasoned, rational answers they cannot get a gun. If not, they will receive a piece of paper telling them where to enlist in the military or how to become a police officer, These are the people who have legitimate reason to carry lethal weapons.”
OMG...the ignorance is astounding. Who gets to ‘interpret’ the answers? If the person can’t articulate acceptable answers they are directed to join the military or law enforcement?
Really? This is exactly why we dare not let the libtards win.
In the Army, your personal weapon and ammunition is generally kept in a secure arms room and is available to you only as allowed by those in authority above you. I’m sure the other four services run things in a similar fashion unless one is in an actual war zone.
See how that works? And we're the crazy ones, huh?
Liberals will write all the rules.
And only their interpretation of responses to their rules is legitimate.
Failure to meet their rules, and their own capricious interpretation will result in recrimination!
But yeah, we have ABSOLUTELY nothing to fear by having Blow and his comrades take our guns - nothing at all.
Oh, my gosh, he unknowingly just made the very point about the true wisdom of the 2nd Amendment!
If we demanded multiple “acceptable” answers be given prior to abortions, gay marriage, or medical marijuana use the ACLU would be going nuts and these leftist would have a well organized march on DC.