Posted on 01/11/2013 7:27:03 AM PST by Uncle Chip
An administrative worker at Connecticuts coroners office has been placed on paid leave after allegedly allowing her husband to view the body of Newtown gunman Adam Lanza.
Jean Henry, a processing technician at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, could face disciplinary action after the investigation is complete, the Hartford Courant reported. She was still on leave Thursday, sources said.
Henry is accused of allowing her husband, who is not a state employee, to enter a refrigerated autopsy room where Lanzas body was awaiting a post mortem on Dec. 16. The only people allowed in the autopsy area are authorized staff and some law enforcement personnel, the Courant reported.
During the macabre viewing, Henry unzipped the bag so her husband could look at Lanza, who shot dead 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14. The couple openly went in and out of the refrigerated room and at least one other employee was aware of what was happening, sources told the newspaper.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
Another early rumor later abandoned.
If he had one on, he could have removed it.
Then again he could have had on a mask with an angry Jason face on it, and that is what she is referring to as him looking "angry".
But I don't see a mask listed as stuff he entered the school with on wikipedia or anywhere else.
So pick your poison. The girl could be right on no matter which way you want to go.
No, that wasn’t the point.
My head is spinning from all the theories/conspiracies. I need to wear my triple-ply Tin Foil Hat!
In all the info, I think: "well, that seems plausible". Then I will read an opposing theory/conspiracy and think: "well, that seems plausible."
Time for afternoon nap.
Yikes...that is way beyond cold.
"I thought that was a hoax and that all of the families are prone to being hoaxed.
I think "prone" is not the word I could have said. Just that the families are targets of hoaxers.
Well, before I’d conclude that was someone other than Manfredia, I’d want to see if any other arrest was mentioned on the police radio, or shown on video. I mean, we know Manfredia was arrested, so if there is only one arrest on the radio/video, it must be him and nobody else.
>>But I don’t see a mask listed as stuff he entered the school with on wikipedia or anywhere else.<<
It’s not hard to use google to find news reports of the killer wearing a mask.
“At the end of the day we still dont know who said what.”
If you don’t accept the words of any media or the officials, then I guess you never will know the truth, unless you get off your behind, drive to Connecticut, and conduct your own investigation. In fact, I’d say it would be highly irresponsible of you to continue to comment on it without doing so, if you really feel that way.
First of all, if you are going to talk about another FReeper, it is common courtesy to ping them. Secondly, anyone can read my posts, they are all conveniently linked to my username, for anyone to see. I don’t need you to repeat them for me.
As I’ve said before, if you have something to say to me, say it to my face. Otherwise, your constant referencing of me with your cutesy intimations is getting tired.
>>I mean, we know Manfredia was arrested, so if there is only one arrest on the radio/video, it must be him and nobody else.<<
The local police dispatch tape carries a report that a teacher saw two shooters running from the scene.
According to George Freund, First officers in the school report the patsy dead. He may very well have been killed by the two fleeing men who were probably the whack team.
The presence of other shooters may explain why the killer, Adam Lanza, 20, was wearing a mask, flack jacket and military fatigues. This is so he couldn’t be distinguished from the other shooters. If he had intended to kill himself, he wouldn’t have needed a disguise.
AKr47...when the government comes to take it, FMCDH.
The eBay is funny!
>>If you dont accept the words of any media or the officials, then I guess you never will know the truth, unless you get off your behind, drive to Connecticut, and conduct your own investigation.<<
Why would I want to do that? Nobody I know was killed that day.
>>In fact, Id say it would be highly irresponsible of you to continue to comment on it without doing so, if you really feel that way.<<
What is irresponsible about it? This is a public forum not a .gov. And if JR wants me to stop, I will. You just don’t like the fact that I’m taxing your brain.
Stay classy, ILS21R.
>>Stay classy, ILS21R.<<
With that I shall claim victory and now leave. Bye.
“Geez, some of the comments here are as nutty as anything uttered by the 9/11 Truthers.”
I made the same observation on another thread. The bodies are hardly cold yet, and it’s “game on” for the nutjobs. At least the JFK assassination theorists had the decency to wait for the Warren Report to come out before denouncing it as a cover-up.
Except Lanza wasn’t wearing any of those things. He was wearing dark or black cloths and khaki tactical or fishing type vest and earplugs.
While I have seen mention of a mask on blogs and some of the earliest news reports when everything was chaotic and reporters appeared to be making stuff up, all the later reports based on interviews with the coroner or investigators mention the ear plugs, the common nature of the vest and dark clothing, but no mention of any mask.
The Hartford Courant has pretty good reporting.
“The local police dispatch tape carries a report that a teacher saw two shooters running from the scene.”
Uh huh, and before we go off topic, what about the second arrest? We know Manfredia was arrested, we have video of that. Manfredia is mentioned on the police tape. So, if there is a second arrest, of a man in the woods, who was NOT Manfredia, where is the mention of him? Where is the video of him being led to the squad car?
ok you pulled me back. good for you.
>>Uh huh, and before we go off topic, what about the second arrest? <<
Maybe the second one got away. Ever think of that?
“What is irresponsible about it?”
By your own admission, you have no possible way of knowing what the hell happened, since you won’t get off your butt and go get direct evidence that would be acceptable to you. So, you are making claims about matters when you have no clue what the truth really is. That’s what is irresponsible.
“You just dont like the fact that Im taxing your brain.”
Taxing my brain? Nah. You are taxing my faith in my fellow man a bit, but that’s nothing more than liberals do every day, so I am used to it.
>>Except Lanza wasnt wearing any of those things. He was wearing dark or black cloths and khaki tactical or fishing type vest and earplugs.
While I have seen mention of a mask on blogs and some of the earliest news reports when everything was chaotic and reporters appeared to be making stuff up, all the later reports based on interviews with the coroner or investigators mention the ear plugs, the common nature of the vest and dark clothing, but no mention of any mask.<<
I like to trust initial reports before the MSM can form their narrative.
The Hartford Courant has pretty good reporting.
Well that is both irrational and illogical because the MSM likes to use their initial bad reporting to support their narrative.
They run off half cocked reporting every thing they think they heard in garbled radio traffic, mis-report questions being asked as statements of fact and deliberately obscure any type of intelligent or accurate information about guns in order to support their narrative.
Furthermore the MSM has a preformed narrative before these type of events even happen so believing that early reports can be more accurate because the media hasn't had time to form the narrative is magical pixie dust.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.