Posted on 01/11/2013 7:27:03 AM PST by Uncle Chip
An administrative worker at Connecticuts coroners office has been placed on paid leave after allegedly allowing her husband to view the body of Newtown gunman Adam Lanza.
Jean Henry, a processing technician at the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, could face disciplinary action after the investigation is complete, the Hartford Courant reported. She was still on leave Thursday, sources said.
Henry is accused of allowing her husband, who is not a state employee, to enter a refrigerated autopsy room where Lanzas body was awaiting a post mortem on Dec. 16. The only people allowed in the autopsy area are authorized staff and some law enforcement personnel, the Courant reported.
During the macabre viewing, Henry unzipped the bag so her husband could look at Lanza, who shot dead 26 people at Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14. The couple openly went in and out of the refrigerated room and at least one other employee was aware of what was happening, sources told the newspaper.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
"She looks like the same girl because they were sisters... and the mother stated that she was wearing the sisters dress. You know, sometimes people do stuff like that as part of the grieving process. Ive got my late Grandpas old parka out for the winter myself, actually."
What does their demeanor look like?
Flame me, folks, I guess I deserve it but: was there any indication of photoshop?
I'm under a little stress right now hence the conspiracy stuff. Don't tell Mr. hummingbird.
Mr. hummingbird does not accept conspiracy theories.
I eat conspiracy theories with breakfast sometimes!
HA!
There were others that were going to the school that day to help with special projects — like Neil Heslin whose son Jesse didn’t make it. You will find his interview on the net if you look.
Heh, heh!
What does that old cartoon say: On the Internet, no one knows you are a dog.
Something like that. The cartoon shows 2 dogs in front of computer!
>>This is why conspiracy theorists often make the claim that ANYTHING that wasnt told to them in the first hours MUST be lies. That way, they can build a credible theory around a small set of facts, and when other facts are revealed that destroy their theory, well, those facts prove the conspiracy because they are clearly false.<<
Then why are you here? The fact is your inane diatribe does nothing to advance the facts of this incident. It tries to obfuscate. Like someone else I know.
Which part???
that she is the only one of her classmates that came out of school that day???
that she was covered in blood that I'm sure everyone else out there could see???
that the she said she saw the shooter's face which she might later have to identify???
that he was angry which is pretty much of a given for anyone to do that???
Her story isn't that elaborate or that long to be beyond credibility, particularly since it is easily verifiable by the forensic evidence, including the blood on the clothes that she was wearing that day.
I'll check it out.
IF an intruder tries to breach our "compound", they will have to pass through ADT, canine barking/attack, and various "weaponry", etc. (i.e. skillet, baseball bat, etc.).
IF they are insistent on coming in I will get "Black's Law Dictionary" to hit them over the head. Lawyering is often an "assault" weapon.
>>Please expand on your logic and reason that states six year olds do not talk this way, then.<<
My logic and reason? Logic and reason does not pick and choose.
Unnamed sources... so the story is BS.
Which one?!
"Settle down" is from Beavis and Butthead.
"SETTLE down, Beavis."
“Running around the school does not equal running into the woods.”
Is there any video of the guy running into/out of the woods? I ask because some media, again getting details wrong on day one, identified him incorrectly as Lanza’s brother. If they could screw up on a detail that big, I wouldn’t put much stock in the “woods” story.
Which part???
that she is the only one of her classmates that came out of school that day???
Name?
that she was covered in blood that I’m sure everyone else out there could see???
Who?
that the she said she saw the shooter’s face which she might later have to identify???
The killer wore a mask.... remember?
that he was angry which is pretty much of a given for anyone to do that???
Who was angry?
Her story isn’t that elaborate or that long to be beyond credibility, particularly since it is easily verifiable by the forensic evidence, including the blood on the clothes that she was wearing that day.
Look.... all I want to do is find out is who did the actual killing.
Uh, yeah... Logic and Reason DO pick and choose, otherwise it's just emotion based falderall.
You stated that six year olds do not talk that way, yet have no expertise in six year olds nor have stated any relevant facts or logic based reasoning chain to back up that statement.
The source is named, Rev. Jim Solomon of New Hope Community Church, Newtown, CT. The fact that the survivor's is being left out of media reports is because most news media have protocols that they do not identify the names of juvenile crime victims without permission. Some states have laws regarding this as well.
IMO you’ve already been plenty generous with your time and keystrokes and JR’s bandwith dealing with these questions.
Sorry about that - I copied the link, just didn’t get it pasted into my post...
This one is great:
Assault weapon - Neanderthal’s AKr47
It’s so easy to use, even a Neanderthal can use it.
You’re right — thanks
>>I wouldnt put much stock in the woods story.<<
Newtown Shooting ~ RAW Video : 2nd Gunmen Being chased into Woods ?? Sandy Hook Connecticut
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TFKDuit8_xU
Police Walked A Man In Camo Pants And Dark Jacket Out Of Woods: Newtown Connecticut School Shooting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ovspEgeMXb4
>>You stated that six year olds do not talk that way, yet have no expertise in six year olds nor have stated any relevant facts or logic based reasoning chain to back up that statement.<<
A six year old would not come out of that situation saying Mommy I’m ok, but all my classmates are dead. It’s ridiculous.
>>The source is named, Rev. Jim Solomon of New Hope Community Church, Newtown, CT. The fact that the survivor’s is being left out of media reports is because most news media have protocols that they do not identify the names of juvenile crime victims without permission. Some states have laws regarding this as well.<<
Oh come on already.... if it were true she’d be on every talk show in the nation. Besides... as uncle chip says we should be able to find out who she is by the process of elimination. So get your stories straight.
Geez, some of the comments here are as nutty as anything uttered by the 9/11 “Truthers”.
It is not a ridiculous thing for a child to say.
For one thing she was very likely being repeatedly asked if she was hurt or okay, so responding to that is very normal. A six year old is very capable of understanding death, particularly a churched one who has had the death and resurrection of Christ explained to them repeatedly, so stating that her friends are dead, a factual statement of the reality just experienced is not ridiculous.
The fact that the child is not all over the media indicates that she doesn’t have stupid parents that worship at the altar of fame and celebrity.
Your logic is all grasping at strawmen.
>>Geez, some of the comments here are as nutty as anything uttered by the 9/11 Truthers.<<
Riiiight... groping TSA agents, attacks on the First Amendment, attacks on the Second Amendment, FISA...
Nothing to see here. Move along.... sheep
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.