Skip to comments.
IRS Warns Employers: Do Not Try to Avoid ObamaCare Insurance Mandate
Cybercast News Service ^
| January 10, 2013
| Matt Cover
Posted on 01/10/2013 6:51:52 AM PST by Olog-hai
The Internal Revenue Service warned employers in a new regulatory proposal not to come up with clever schemes to avoid Obamacares employer health insurance mandate.
The IRS said it would soon issue anti-abuse rules to discourage employers from taking advantage of any regulatory loopholes.
The Treasury Department and the IRS are aware of various structures being considered under which employers might use temporary staffing agencies (or other staffing agencies)
to evade application of section 4980H [the employer insurance mandate], the IRS said in a proposed regulatory announcement issued December 28.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: fuirs; govtabuse; irs; mandate; nazistate; obama; obamabrownshirts; obamacare; policestate; tyranny; waronliberty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
This keeps up, there will soon be no employers to warn.
1
posted on
01/10/2013 6:52:02 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
“Ve have vays of makink you talk”
2
posted on
01/10/2013 6:53:55 AM PST
by
skeeter
To: Olog-hai
3
posted on
01/10/2013 6:54:15 AM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: Olog-hai
And you can just forget about driving at 64 mph as well; that will only attract our suspicion.
4
posted on
01/10/2013 6:54:35 AM PST
by
Steely Tom
(If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
To: Olog-hai
Anyone question now why the idiot in our White House has recently armed all federal agents with an enormous amounts of weapons and ammo? Has anyone now any questions as to why they needed all those weapons and ammunition?
They know there’ll be some big problems pretty soon with the citizens of this country.
This is far beyond a conspiracy.
5
posted on
01/10/2013 6:55:54 AM PST
by
laweeks
To: Olog-hai
...employers might use temporary staffing agencies... Huh! Thanks for the tip! Of course there might be a bunch of these agencies that have 49 employees apiece...
6
posted on
01/10/2013 6:57:08 AM PST
by
alancarp
(Obama will grab your guns and ship them to Mexican drug mobs.)
To: Olog-hai
7
posted on
01/10/2013 6:57:10 AM PST
by
cripplecreek
(REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
To: Olog-hai
The Internal Revenue Service warned employers in a new regulatory proposal
Another division of Obama's "Brown Shirts" Seig Heil!!
8
posted on
01/10/2013 6:57:53 AM PST
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: Olog-hai
hey they told us in school this exact sentence “tax evasion is illegal, tax avoidance is legal”, so is the IRS putting the kabosh on tax planning?
9
posted on
01/10/2013 6:57:53 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: Olog-hai
People need to start turning it around. "Nice government agency you have here. Be a shame if anything happened to it"
/johnny
To: Olog-hai
11
posted on
01/10/2013 7:02:47 AM PST
by
dfwgator
To: Olog-hai
When in America did it become a "LOOPHOLE" to legally avoid paying more of your hard earned money to the Government?
The media is our number ONE enemy.
12
posted on
01/10/2013 7:04:38 AM PST
by
Cheerio
(Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
To: Olog-hai
You mean they left a ‘loophole’ in their obambacare law?
13
posted on
01/10/2013 7:04:49 AM PST
by
Scrambler Bob
(Honk Honk - I am the Goose that laid the Golden Eggs - and I have tightened the sphincter! ....)
To: Olog-hai
Lol! If stopping the use of tax loopholes was really this easy, why haven't they just issued one of these "anti loophole" edicts across the board?
Answer: They are just blowing smoke and trying to scare companies into compliance. If a creative tax accountant uses a loophole, then the IRS has the option to challenge it on a case by case basis in court.
14
posted on
01/10/2013 7:08:22 AM PST
by
apillar
To: Scrambler Bob
I guess they had to pass the law to see where the loopholes were in it.
15
posted on
01/10/2013 7:09:11 AM PST
by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Thus, you can forget the specific words of the statute, it says whatever the IRS says it says.
To: Olog-hai
“IRS Warns Employers: Do Not Try to Avoid ObamaCare Insurance Mandate”
Addendum: “Do not even THINK about trying to avoid the ObamaCare Insurance Mandate”
Addendum: “We will tell you what ‘avoid’ and ‘try’ means
To: Olog-hai
Right, so there is no choice, as Obama promised.
18
posted on
01/10/2013 7:15:52 AM PST
by
Durbin
To: Olog-hai
Similarly, IRS said that if an employer hires the same person for two part-time stints by using two different employment agencies, it will hold either the employer or one of the employment agencies liable for the mandates penalties.And the government beast continues to grow, and kill productive jobs.
19
posted on
01/10/2013 7:17:58 AM PST
by
FatherofFive
(Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
To: Olog-hai
Perhaps itâs time to change the name of the IRS. In the spirit of Dear Leaderâs awesome transparent administration, Iâm thinking something along the lines of âHouse of Overlordsâ or HOs (for short) might be appropriate.
20
posted on
01/10/2013 7:19:50 AM PST
by
liberalh8ter
(If Barack has a memory like a steel trap, why can't he remember what the Constitution says?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson