Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SMGFan

I don’t care for racial “advocacy” groups, especially not for groups that are barely even a subculture, let alone an ethnicity. But that cover is stupid. I don’t know why they always have to have these close-ups with blank stares that make people look like weirdos.

If it’s a lib they’ll usually soften the image, leave it a little out if focus. But they do it to them, too. Warren Buffet, I remember, looked like a troll on one cover or another. They gave Paling a disturbingly extreme close up, with the excuse that they were zooming in on her daring, or something which related to the article. But she was still hot, so no harm.


5 posted on 01/09/2013 1:40:31 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tublecane

Whoops, that’s Palin and zooming in on her earing. Stupid kindle.


8 posted on 01/09/2013 1:42:49 PM PST by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tublecane

“I don’t know why they always have to have these close-ups with blank stares that make people look like weirdos”

And these idiots pose for them too, doing everything the photog says like a fashion model. Totally gay.


10 posted on 01/09/2013 1:44:03 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Tublecane
They gave Palin... a disturbingly extreme close up

That was Newsweek, not Time. Time was pretty decent to Palin. But here is another conservative who got "the treatment":


21 posted on 01/09/2013 2:34:30 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("If you're going through hell, keep on going."--Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson