Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: thackney
Now multiply that challenge by at least 10 and you get the volume the Keystone XL would be delivering.

Not to the east, and not with all that Alberta crude...
42 posted on 01/10/2013 5:45:58 AM PST by railroader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: railroader

No sorry. I wasn’t trying to imply it was going East.

I was just trying to put in perspective the volume the Keystone XL would carry and the difficulty of picking up that volume with rail.

Rail will help and rail will and should be used. But it really is a supplement to the huge volumes carried on major pipelines; it is not a reasonable replacement for major pipelines.


43 posted on 01/10/2013 5:56:15 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson