[Fireone]

Yesterday, my newly elected Rep. Rick Nolan, said he backs the 2nd Amendment, but no one needs an “assault rifle” to hunt ducks.
It’s pretty obvious that none of these supposed “2A backers” has ever READ THE 2nd AMENDMENT, let alone the Constitution they swore, under oath, to support and defend.
Chip Cravaack, we need you back!

[Lazamataz]

Yesterday, my newly elected Rep. Rick Nolan, said he backs the 2nd Amendment, but no one needs an “assault rifle” to hunt ducks.

Every time one of these asshats goes into th 'duck hunting' comment, I turn to them, cup my hand in a circle next to my eye so I can peer through it, smile ominously, and say "It ain't duck's I'm hunting."

[Politically Correct]

Yesterday, my newly elected Rep. Rick Nolan, said he backs the 2nd Amendment, but no one needs an “assault rifle” to hunt ducks.

I hunt ducks all the time with my AR-15.........haven't hit one yet.
Am I doing something wrong?

[Eagle of Liberty]

It’s pretty obvious that none of these supposed “2A backers” has ever READ THE 2nd AMENDMENT, let alone the Constitution they swore, under oath, to support and defend.

Most current Fed Reps, Senators, President or Judges don't really care whether they follow their oath OR the Constitution. We are truly being run by people who move with popular opinion or current events. They have no desire to take on the huge tasks of fixing the problems they created. They are more interested in taking away any liberties that they can.

[dforest]

All of these jackasses know why we have the 2nd amendment. They just pretend it is for hunting only.

You see, the progressives refuse to acknowledge the real meaning because they are the ones the framers were referring to that the guns were left in our hands to protect us from.

I wish people would quit arguing anything other than the real intent. You can see they are afraid to talk about the real intent of the 2nd amendment. SO MAKE THEM!