Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: spetznaz

No doubt they should consider it, but I find the level of analysis presented in the article laughable.

Again, if Canada needs to fly missions in contested air space in the first few days of a conflict, stealth is an important part of the mix. I consider that it may take over a day to get the US involved (if under current administration, that ever happens. I don’t have a lot of love for current administration.)

After the first few days, assuming US air dominance is put in play, the Gripen would be a useful auxilary platform. Before then: nearly worthless. If Canada wants to depend completely on the US to defend its airspace, then why buy any at all? Zero is a lot cheaper than any alternative.

I would also poke fun at an analysis that depends heavily on max top speed. Max top speed isn’t used much. Simplicity, lightness of pitot inlets limits top speed to about Mach 1.6, but that is not a big factor in air combat because drag/fuel usage is very high there, and heat of SS reduces survivability. Supersonic speed is especially difficult when using many external hard points as the shock waves coming off the external stores interact. Range of supercruise depends on load, which also depends on where in a mission it occurs: Later in a mission, after fuel is burned off and weapons expended, greater SC range can be achieved.

This appears to be using Gripen furnished statistics: Max number of hard points which is critical, until you want max speed, upon which time hard points no longer matter and you can used a figure based on nearly slick load.

Noone knows what war will occur in the future. Smart money buys a range of capability, and attempts to cover weaknesses with diplomacy or spinelessness. I don’t think the proud Canadians like to hand over defense of their country for the first few days to the US, but I may be wrong.


17 posted on 01/08/2013 8:55:08 AM PST by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker

Do not purchase armament from Sweden. When my Dad, his brothers and friends were getting their asses shot off in wwii, the swedes were selling munitions to the Gerries. When Sweden steps up and takes on a NATO role and stops being a cowardly arms merchant maybe then but not now.


27 posted on 01/12/2013 7:49:18 AM PST by albertabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: donmeaker

Do not purchase armament from Sweden. When my Dad, his brothers and friends were getting their asses shot off in wwii, the swedes were selling munitions to the Gerries. When Sweden steps up and takes on a NATO role and stops being a cowardly arms merchant maybe then but not now.


28 posted on 01/12/2013 7:49:45 AM PST by albertabound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson