The feds didn’t say that, a reporter said they said that. See the difference?
You keep posting links construing inaccurate media reporting as evidence of conspiracy.
Never ascribe to malice (or conspiracy) that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Yeah, I see the difference. Fact is, the media named the Feds a the source of their information. If I can't believe them then, why must I believe them now?
You keep posting links construing inaccurate media reporting as evidence of conspiracy.
Yeah, people in their own words and what they say is a conspiracy. What I posted was contradictions in an evolving story.
If you want to believe the pap you're being served, by all means down it heartily at your own peril. Me, I'll be cautious and question every bit of it.
Never ascribe to malice (or conspiracy) that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
Sounds fancy, yet means absolutely nothing. What network do you work for?