They guy in the woods was a birder. He did not have a gun. The first responders who entered the school...and took and returned fire...said he was using the bushmaster. They heard it...they saw it.
>>They guy in the woods was a birder. He did not have a gun.<<
What was his name?
I understand the storyline. My point is that it doesn’t add up to what the eye witnesses (that don’t work for the government) were saying. One of those groups are lying. Perhaps we can just call the 2nd shooter, who happened to wear cammo just like the “birder”, John Doe #2 and never hear about him from the media again?
There was more than one guy in the woods.