“Yeah, because the media would fall in line behind Romney just as they have for Obama? I sort of doubt that one.”
They fawned over his ROmneycare in Massachussetts, and his “brilliant” governing in appointing liberal judges, introducing homosexual marriage in Massachussetts, his gun ban.
Yes, they’d have been quite content and happy with a liberal.
Especially if he did as president what he did as governor.
You do understand that a choice between evils is still evil?
You also further understand that anything that went south under Romney would have been blamed on Republicans?
Anything happening now, the Dems can own fully.
The Social Security tax rising, the Dems own that.
If Romney had been elected, they’d have tried to pin it on Republicans.
Food for thought that last one.
“You do understand that a choice between evils is still evil?
You also further understand that anything that went south under Romney would have been blamed on Republicans?
Anything happening now, the Dems can own fully.
The Social Security tax rising, the Dems own that.
If Romney had been elected, theyd have tried to pin it on Republicans.
Food for thought that last one.”
You do understand there is a difference between a serious wound and a fatal wound. I see Obama as a fatal wound to America.
As for who owns what? Really? The low information voters have figured out they can impact the vote. And the media blames Republicans for anything bad, whether the Republicans could have impacted the situation or not.