[Democrat_media]

You really believe that Romney would be making this push and as successfully with the media's help as this Obama communist is for taking away our gun rights? seek help.

[Darksheare]

July 1 2004 he signed a permanent ban on semi-autos in Massachussetts.
Yes, he would.
http://www.nationalgunrights.org/pres_files/Romneyflier.pdf
http://www.ontheissues.org/2012/Mitt_Romney_Gun_Control.htm

And two threads about it:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2877942/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2874131/posts

Yes, on the subject of guns he’d have been just as bad.
Further, States Rights have nothing to do with the 2nd Amendment.
2nd Amendment was incorporated against the states and thus no state can miraculously ignore.
So saying that “States Rights” means that as Governor Romney could sign a ban on guns and be okay for Conservatives to support is intellectually dishonest at best.

It isn’t about States Rights or how butthurt you are over Romeny losing.
It’s about our rights, and he’d have trampled them just the same.
The GOP forced his nomination down our throats, they’d already chosen for us who the nominee was going to be.
In the last two elections they chose a RINO.
Open your eyes and grow up.

[Orangedog]

You really believe that Romney would be making this push and as successfully with the media's help as this Obama communist is for taking away our gun rights?

Not only that, but he would have the GOP leadership backing him and telling you all to shut up and sit down because you have nowhere else to go. I know it's hard to accept that he actually signed a sweeping gun ban into law. Lots of battered housewives believe hubby has changed and will never hit them again...and they end up in the ER again.