cute, but that doesn’t change the facts in this case
1. The Police had NO reasonable suspicion a crime was committed or about to be committed.
2. they had no probable cause to get a warrant
3 They Had No Warrant, nada
4 Everything they did from the time they stepped in the door was “Outside the boundaries” of Law Enforcement, in other words they were acting in a “lawless manner”
5 They Robbed this Mans house While Armed
6 they Stole Dangerous Narcotics
7 They the Distributed Those Dangerous Narcotics to there Associates.
My world is pretty black and white, I would give them 20 years,no parole, general population.
Just because someone is 80 years old, doesn't mean they are automatically above suspicion at any death scene, family or not.Probably especially not family.
Your #1-#7 is immediately invalidated because it is just your own ignorant opinion of a single “report”, unrelated to any actual factual knowledge regarding this particular case.
In a real black and white world, you would be instantly indicted for falsely attempting to portray your opinions as facts.
Please tell me you are a registered Democrat voter!