Horse manure.
If you use a gun to rob somebody, screw you. No gun for you again, ever.
You don't really believe that there has ever been even ONE felon who was prevented from being armed because of the law do you?
Why are you willing to put up with the BATFE and the NICS for such meager gains? I support death penalties. I support tatooing "VIOLENT FELON" on the foreheads of such, and I support some limited liability for intentionally transferring of a gun to a person with such a tatoo.
But I don't support the de facto gun registration created by the FFL system, I don't support waiting periods, I don't support requiring a permit to carry a gun, I don't support nonsensical quizzes on gun safety that cost $25, I don't support disarming the adults responsible for the safety of our children, and I don't support banning three-ounce plastic pistol grips on rifles.
Do you support all those infringements? By doing so you lend credence to the call for the incremental nonsense we see happening now. There is no "reasonable restriction" clause in the Second Amendment.
Please tell me where your "Line in the Sand" is. Your support for the present nonsense will inevitably lead to every state having Kalifornia's 68 pages of gun laws or much, much worse.
“If you use a gun to rob somebody, screw you. No gun for you again, ever.”
If the law does not order the execution of a person, it should not deprive him of his right to self-defense.
If you want to ensure that an armed robber never again owns a gun, you should lobby to have armed robbery punished with the death penalty.