Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sten
to date... NO documentation proving eligibility for 0bama has EVER been OFFICIALLY submitted anywhere

I suspect no document proving eligibility for any previous president has been filed anywhere, as there is no provision in federal or state law requiring such filing, or indeed providing a place to file it.

Youse guys had four years to get - one - of the 57 states to pass a law requiring defined evidence of eligibility to be filed before a candidate goes on the ballot.

Not one state did so. This seems to indicate a general absence of public support for your position.

I also strongly oppose inserting the judiciary into this issue. Excessive power of the judges is the greatest single threat to our Constitution, and making them a court of appeal with power to overturn elections is a really, really bad idea.

Also, do we really want Joe Biden for President?

22 posted on 01/05/2013 11:20:41 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

If a candidate seeks the presidency, it is his responsibility to present valid documents to include a birth certificate which is not a forgery, a social security card which is not stolen, and a selective service card which is not forged. All his records have been found and kept hidden by Perkins Coie Law Firm by Obama’s lawyer Bauer. Pelosi had to certify he was eligible without any proof. She had to make two forms. One with “Constitutionl” on it and the other without. So far, every judge has been corrupted or threatened since none will move the cases along.

The Senate Judiciary under Hillary, Coburn, Obama, and others did a full investigation of McCain and found his documents were valid. They did not even check for Obama’s records re eligibility. In fact, on the resolution, Obama was allowed to add that others once thought ineligible were actually eligible (Which was a lie.)


23 posted on 01/06/2013 1:12:55 AM PST by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

most recently, John McCain was required to provide all data proving eligibility... and the supreme court ruled he was.

as for who is supposed to check, that would be the state division of elections, as you are supposed to be eligible to assume office to even be on the ballot.

of course there is no penalty for not checking... so the supervisors of elections just fail to do their job, hoping all goes well.

of course, if the person that wins isn’t eligible... the supervisor would have helped perpetuate election fraud... which does have a penalty

therefore, we should probability go after the various supervisors of elections in the various states if they did not collect the required documentation before putting the names on the ballot.


28 posted on 01/06/2013 5:08:31 AM PST by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson