Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Just had this sent to me on Facebook. Is this for real?? Searched for it on FR but couldn't find it.
1 posted on 01/05/2013 7:29:06 PM PST by neal1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neal1960

I’d be in favor of limiting every President to ONE term.


2 posted on 01/05/2013 7:30:23 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960
Looks real to me.

Sponsor: Rep. Serrano, Jose E. [D-NY-15] (Introduced 01/04/2013)

3 posted on 01/05/2013 7:31:55 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (Where can I pick up a 2013 Mayan calendar?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

it starts


7 posted on 01/05/2013 7:33:58 PM PST by 1st Division guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960
Serrano pulls this stunt at the start of every Congress since Soetoro fraudulently assumed office.
8 posted on 01/05/2013 7:35:18 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro can't pass E-verify)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

30 of 50 (or is it 57) governors are Republican. This must be a constituent service item to file this bill.

A counter-proposal: An Amendment modifying life-time tenure for federal judges to make they stand for a retention vote every 4 years (held in the off-year cycle election). This would mitigate the problem of insulating judges from having to run for office, yet would allow the voters to eject a judge who sufficiently offended them with his/her rulings.


9 posted on 01/05/2013 7:35:28 PM PST by theBuckwheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

I think Democrats do this every time they get a second-term Democrat in. I know they did it for Clinton also. In this upside down world we live in though...


10 posted on 01/05/2013 7:35:38 PM PST by Chipper (You can't kill an Obamazombie by destroying the brain...they didn't have one to begin with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

Damned communist bastards sure love their dictators.


12 posted on 01/05/2013 7:38:08 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hjres15


14 posted on 01/05/2013 7:40:44 PM PST by barmag25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

Boehner is probably scampering over to the White House as we speak for a private discussion on the bill.


18 posted on 01/05/2013 7:50:20 PM PST by SIDENET (I've drawn my line in the sand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

I like to see the election of Senators go back to the state legislatures. And add in, term limits for members of Congress.


19 posted on 01/05/2013 7:51:32 PM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960; All

It looks real. H O W E V E R ...

Article V of the Constitution clearly indicates that, while either the states or Congress can propose amendments to the Constitution, ONLY the states, NOT Congress, have the power to ratify it. And thanks to Obama’s efforts to divide the country, I just don’t see such a proposed amendment to the Constitution getting the necessary 3/4 states support to ratify it, particularly since the ratification process isn’t necessarily based on the popular vote which would make it easier for the Democrats to work voting fraud.

Also, since Article V is arguably the best kept secret of the unconstitutionally big federal government, I’m not so sure that DC lawmakers really want voters to find out about Article V.


20 posted on 01/05/2013 7:55:30 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

Well if zero gets another SC justice, they can give zero the chance to run again. The court will simply redefine zero’s first two terms as one term. This is not so much a stretch considering what Roberts did last year on 0-care. .


21 posted on 01/05/2013 7:55:41 PM PST by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; an EMP confined to DC would be much appreciated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960
Ø should be granted a third term. And, it should be for life.


22 posted on 01/05/2013 7:56:14 PM PST by C210N (When people fear government there is tyranny; when government fears people there is liberty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

Article V, or 5, in the US Constitution sets forth how to
amend the Constitution.

There are 4 ways:

1. Proposal— 2/3rds of each House of Congress and it is
ratified by 3/4ths of the State Legislatures.

2. Proposal—same as #1 2/3rds, each House of Congress
while ratification is done by 3/4ths of the State’s holding
Constitutional Conventions.

3.Proposal —A Special Constitutional Convention is called
by Congress, at the request of 2/3rds of the states.
Ratification is done by 3/4ths of the State legislatures.

4. Proposal— same as #3 while ratification is done by
3/4ths of the State Special Constitutional Conventions.

Informal Methods:

1. basic legislation— laws which fill in the basic meaning
of the Constitution. Like control carried by airlines, they
did not have planes in 1787 but they did have trade.

2. presidential actions, in carrying out foreign policy or
using troops without declaring war.

3. Supreme Court decisions, like Brown v. Board of
Education.

4. Political parties— how we elect people to congress and
for pesident. How Government is operated, by political
party. Parties are not found in the Constitution.

5. Tradition— the way things are done. Until the 22nd
amendment Presidents did not serve over 2 terms
and until the 25th amendment was passed the Vice
President served out the rest of the deceased president’s
term as the president NOT as an acting president.

IOW... they can’t do it without 3/4 of the States legislatures voting on it favorably.

LLS


23 posted on 01/05/2013 7:58:34 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

This is almost always the first (or one of the first) bills to show up in a new Congress. Not to worry, this has been going on for years.


26 posted on 01/05/2013 8:21:43 PM PST by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

Not needed.

Precedent has been set - The US Constitution does not apply to Barack Obama.


30 posted on 01/05/2013 8:56:31 PM PST by Iron Munro (I Miss America !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

LOL! NO CHANCE.


31 posted on 01/05/2013 9:10:05 PM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neal1960

Gingrich Productions just sent an e-mail regarding this issue.

Looking forward to the confrontations on this matter.


42 posted on 02/23/2013 1:14:21 PM PST by Gene Eric (The Palin Doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson