This will be an interesting exercise to see if the media will continue to suppress the information out of Newtown.
1. He did not use the AR-15 to shoot the kids in Newtown.
2. He stole the guns from his mother.
3. He had been denied purchase of a gun already.
Okay once and for all WAS the AR used in the shootings or not?
Early reports said no, but later reports state it was used. Do we know what happened?
It’s weird. They trotted out that medical examiner to proclaim that all the victims he examined had been shot multiple times with a long barrelled gun. Complete dog and pony show to drive home that one particular point. Then total silence. Nothing about the actual gun used, where it was found, number of magazines, rounds fired.....nothing.
This thing stinks to high heaven.
1. He did not use the AR-15 to shoot the kids in Newtown.
The bulk of the evidence is that he did use the AR-15. There was early misreporting by the MSM.
Lots of reasons to mistrust the MSM and early reporting.
Regarding 1. I saw that early (he used two handguns), but haven’t seen anything on that lately. Do you have source I can use?
Can we please settle this once and for all? Several news reports say that he did:
In Newtown, in addition to the Bushmaster M-4 carbine, two handguns were found at the scene, a 10-millimeter Glock and a 9-millimeter Sig Sauer, although the rifle is what Mr. Lanza used, pumping up to 11 bullets into each victims body, according to the medical examiner. All three guns belonged to his mother, officials said.
Dr. Carver said it appeared that all of the children had been killed by a long rifle that Mr. Lanza was carrying; a .223 Bushmaster semiautomatic rifle was one of the several weapons police found in the school. The other guns were semiautomatic pistols, including a 10-millimeter Glock and a 9-millimeter Sig Sauer.
According to the state's chief medical examiner, H. Wayne Carver, many of the victims were shot multiple times with the same "long weapon"the Bushmaster rifle.