You are argumentative, not reasonable. Reread my post listing the rights of citizenship. If there are no rights there is no citizenship.
For values of "argumentative" and "not reasonable" equaling "you disagree with me," maybe. It's a simple question, really: you claim that people without citizenship rights (as defined by you)--specifically children--are not citizens regardless of birthplace or parentage. I've only asked you if you have any support in law, precedence, legal opinion, or anything outside your own skull for that position.