Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokeyblue
Just because crime X occurs and group A, B or C do nothing about it does not negate the occurence of the crime.

Yes, but if group A, B or C are direct victims of that crime and they don't even claim that crime X occurred, then it seriously calls into question the claim that crime X occurred.

Palin did drop a lot in my estimation when she said nothing about Lt. Col. Lakin being sent to prison over the issue.

What about when she lost an election to someone who wasn't eligible and failed to do anything about it? What's your estimation of that? My estimation is that Palin is a common-sense conservative who has no time for any of this birther nonsense. I believe that she's bright enough to understand that Obama was an eligible candidate. Apparently, you, like the MSM, think she's stupid.

OK, so you've admitted that you don't think much of Palin or Romney. I'm going to guess that you'd be equally dismissive of McCain. What about Newt Gingrich? What about Rick Santorum? Michele Bachmann? Are they are RINOs who only fight conservatives? Or have they "dropped" in your estimation, too? Who did stand up for LTC Lakin? It seems like there's more conservatives on your fecal roster than the average DUmmie.

So that's my final reason for rejecting the birther crowd: I don't want to have to smear people like Sarah Palin because they don't buy into a ridiculous conspiracy theory.

You OWN Obama. He’s all YOURS.

Is that the new rule? When you recognize that an opposition candidate is eligible you OWN him? So I I guess OWNed Clinton, too.

I gave money to conservative candidates, including members of congress who will act as a firewall to Obama's policies. I could have done more, but because I wasn't running around the country like a clown inventing ridiculous legal claims, I now OWN Obama.

Meanwhile, you're on a conservative forum, bad mouthing conservatives and sewing division. I'm not the one who has to defend his actions here.

137 posted on 01/05/2013 10:37:00 AM PST by Mr. Know It All
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. Know It All
What about when she lost an election to someone who wasn't eligible and failed to do anything about it? What's your estimation of that? My estimation is that Palin is a common-sense conservative who has no time for any of this birther nonsense. I believe that she's bright enough to understand that Obama was an eligible candidate. Apparently, you, like the MSM, think she's stupid.

Funny how you like to focus on those not involved in the crime and their lack of action instead of focusing on YOUR CRIMINAL BUDDY OBAMA and his actions.

My opinion of Palin is irrelevant and would take up too much of my time to post fully about it.

Apparently, you, like the MSM, think she's stupid.

Reductio ad absurdum

Argumentum ad ridiculum

You lose. Again.

OK, so you've admitted that you don't think much of Palin or Romney. I'm going to guess that you'd be equally dismissive of McCain. What about Newt Gingrich? What about Rick Santorum? Michele Bachmann? Are they are RINOs who only fight conservatives? Or have they "dropped" in your estimation, too? Who did stand up for LTC Lakin? It seems like there's more conservatives on your fecal roster than the average DUmmie.

Again, what groups A,B, or C do or do not do has no bearing on the fact that crime X occurred.

You spend a lot of time putting YOUR WORDS in other peoples mouths.

And yes, you deserve everything the Usurper gives you since you support him.

138 posted on 01/05/2013 11:06:26 AM PST by Smokeyblue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson