Smokeyblue: You lose.
In the make-believe world with citizenship laws that don't exist and Supreme Court rulings that never happened, I lose.
In the real world, where people actually have to prove things, Obama is still president.
None of you guys can explain why the RNC or any other prominent Republican will launch a serious challenge on this slum-dunk winning issue. Mitt Romney just spent half a billion dollars trying to win the presidency. Please explain why he doesn't have a team of the best conservative lawyers in the country in Washington right now fighting to prove he lost due to fraud.
OK, maybe Romney's a big loser, but what about Sarah Palin? Again: Sarah Palin has built her career taking on corruption, even when it wasn't what the GOP-e wanted her to do. This is a woman who would have been VP is it weren't for Obama's supposed fraudulent presidency. She might even be president now. Despite so much on the line both personally and patriotically, Sarah Palin hasn't even lifted a finger. Is she a big loser, too? Come on guys, clear this up for me, since you're so full of information.
Silence is consent, guys. The deafening silence on this issue means, "Yeah, OK, we accept Obama as a legitimate candidate." Why? Could it possibly be because he is? If he isn't you have a lot of explaining to do.
I'm going to take your collective silence on this question (which I've repeated several times) to mean that you think Sarah Palin is in on the fraud, in which case... well... I'll keep it civil and just say I think you should be ashamed of your position.
Of course your arguement is non-sensical.
Just because crime X occurs and group A, B or C do nothing about it does not negate the occurence of the crime.
Falsely conflating the two issues is a distraction of YOUR own silence and support for Obama. You OWN Obama. He’s all YOURS.
But ....
Palin did drop a lot in my estimation when she said nothing about Lt. Col. Lakin being sent to prison over the issue.
RNC is a fund-raising organization for the same pigs at the same trough.
And Romney only fights conservatives.
Your argument here is called circular logic. “Because Obama hasn’t been challenged by politicians, then he must be legitimate.” It’s a logical fallacy. Also, this has been addressed several times, and Obama apologists ignore that it has been addressed. Politicians are politicians whether they are Republican or Democrat and some issues give the appearance of being toxic, no matter who brings it up. This is one of those issues because Obama’s supporters have made it toxic by accusing anyone of questioning Obama’s legitimacy as racist. And there are a lot of dumb Obama supporters who buy into this more than they do the idea of “free healthcare.” Politicians don’t want to lose potential voters from the other side of the political aisle. If they think an issue will lose voters for them, they will try to stay as neutral as possible on that issue. Second, they don’t want something like this to come back and bite them if they decide to run their own questionable candidate later.