Again, you are shooting with blanks. Citizenship does not exist until the age of consent.
I thought I'd read all the citizenship arguments here, but this is a new one. Are you claiming that 16-year-olds are not citizens, no matter where they were born or who their parents were? And that since they can't transfer citizenship they don't have, all the children of teenage parents in this country are not citizens? If Bristol Palin's son had been born two months earlier, he would not have been an American citizen, much less a natural born one? Do they suddenly become citizens when their parents reach the age of consent (whatever that is--does it vary by state?), or are they never citizens unless they get naturalized?
Do you have any support at all for this idea?