Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too
Relevance isn't based on who the liberals talk about. Let's be rational here.
48 posted on 01/03/2013 12:13:07 PM PST by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Durus
Relevance depends on who can deliver the goods vs. who's just talking about it.

Palin did get some good conservative candidates elected to various offices, but beyond that she can't directly deliver.

Look at Romney. He got 60 million people to vote for him to Obama's 65 million, yet you don't hear a peep from Romney.

Why didn't he try to parlay that support into a faction to give him a platform from which to speak? Instead, he just slinks away as if none of it mattered?

Romney could have been speaking out publicly on the fiscal cliff, even after losing the election by a few points. He still speaks for 60 million people, which is more than Boehner or Reid could say.

Right now, Palin just speaks for herself. To be relevant, she needs to convince a few million people to vote for her again, and then get into a federal body where she can deliver directly.

-PJ

59 posted on 01/03/2013 12:32:14 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson